Call: 804-828-0636
Toll-free: 1-866-VCU-BOOK
Fax: (804) 828-6089
509 North 12th Street
Box 980582
Richmond, VA 23298-0582
Background questions ask for general knowledge about an illness, disease, condition, process or thing. For example:
Consult textbooks or point-of-care tools, such as UpToDate to answer background questions.
Foreground questions ask for specific knowledge to inform clinical decisions, typically concerning a specific patient or population. These questions tend to be more specific and complex compared to background questions. Foreground questions may be further categorized into one of 4 major types: treatment/therapy, diagnosis, prognosis, or etiology/harm. For example,
Consult medical databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ACP Journal Club to address foreground questions.
Why should you use PICO to define the clinical question?
| Patient, Population or Problem | How would I describe a group of patients similar to mine? |
| Intervention | Which main intervention, exposure, or prognostic factor am I considering? |
| Comparison (if appropriate) | What is the main alternative to compare with the intervention? |
| Outcome | What can I hope to accomplish, measure, improve, affect? |
| Type of Question | How would I categorize this question (therapy, diagnosis, prognosis, etiology/harm)? |
| Type of Study | What would be the best study design in order to answer this question? (see Types of Studies tab) |
Recognizing the type of clinical question of interest is an important part of the Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) process. Establishing the question type allows you to:
Identifying your question type will also assist you in critically appraising the evidence based on the appropriateness and rigor of the research methods described in a paper.
| Question Type | Types of Evidence |
|---|---|
| Therapy/Treatment: Questions about effectiveness of interventions on improving patient outcomes. | Meta-Analysis; Systematic Review; Randomized controlled trial |
| Prevention: Questions about effectiveness of an intervention or exposure in preventing morbidity and mortality. | Meta-Analysis; Systematic Review; Randomized controlled trial; Prospective study |
| Diagnosis: Questions about the ability of a test or procedure to differentiate between those with and without a condition or disease | Randomized controlled trial; Cohort study |
| Prognosis: Questions about the probable cause of a patient's disease or the likelihood that he or she will develop an illness | Cohort Study, Case Control Series |
| Etiology: Questions about the harmful effect of an intervention or exposure on a patient | Cohort study |
| Syntheses |
| Systematic Review: summary of studies conducted using specified criteria to identify, appraise, and summarize studies about a particular research question. |
| Meta-Analysis: summary of therapy trials using statistical methods to create a single weighted estimate of the intervention effect; studies with higher sample size are given more weight |
| Experimental Design |
| Randomized Control Trial (RCT): An experimental method where randomization should ensure that comparison groups are equal. |
| Non-Experimental Design |
| Cohort Study: follow one or more groups of individuals who have not yet suffered the adverse event and monitor the number of outcomes that occur over time. These need to be done when it is either not ethical or not practical to randomly assign patients to be "exposed" to something. Observational Design can be prospective or retrospective. |
| Case-Control Study: Collection of "cases" who have suffered the outcome and "controls" who have not. Investigators count the number of patients with a prognostic factor in the cases and the controls. These need to be done when the outcome of interest is rare or takes a long time to develop. |
| Case Series and Reports: Reports of patient scenarios that do not provide evidence of a causal relationship. |
Case 1: A 55-year African American male with hypertension lives in a rural area about 2-hours from his medical doctor. The doctor is considering prescribing a telemonitoring device to track the patient's blood pressure and to assess his compliance with the medication regimen.
P: 55-year old African American male with hypertension
I: telemonitoring
C: usual care
O: compliance with medication regimen
Study question: Among middle-aged adult African American males on medication for hypertension, is telemonitoring an effective approach for ensuring compliance with a medication regimen?
Case 2: A 12-year old girl presents for her annual dental check up. She has three new cavities and you are trying to decide whether to prescribe a home-based fluoride regimen or recommend fluoride treatments at the dentist to prevent future caries.
P: 12-year old girl
I: home-based fluoride treatment
C: fluoride treatments at provider
O: prevention of dental caries
Study Question: Among adolescent girls, how does a home-based fluoride regimen compare with fluoride treatments at the dentist to prevent cavities?
Case 3: A 70-year old female has made multiple attempts to quit smoking in the past using nicotine replacement therapy. She presents at your practice with renewed motivation. You remember reading that anti-depressants can help people quit tobacco and would like evidence about this potential treatment in older women.
P: 70-year old female smoker
I: Anti-depressant, e.g. Buproprion, in combination with nicotine replacement therapy
C: nicotine replacement therapy alone
O: tobacco cessation